Soccer tactic board for macbook2/11/2024 ![]() ![]() Schiller is the only Apple executive quoted in the press release, and to my ear, his writing hand is all over the entire announcement. To remain on the same business terms in place today if they Processing, new capabilities for alternative browser engines andĬontactless payments, and more. “Developers can now learn about the new tools and terms availableįor alternative app distribution and alternative payment In the EU and around the world,” said Phil Schiller, Apple Fellow. Our priority remainsĬreating the best, most secure possible experience for our users Protect EU users from the unavoidable increased privacy and ![]() Markets Act’s requirements in the European Union, while helping to “The changes we’re announcing today comply with the Digital Start with the main Apple Newsroom press release, “ Apple Announces Changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store in the European Union”: It’s really hard to summarize everything Apple announced yesterday, but I’ll try. Yesterday’s announcements, I think, show why. And each time, I start by asking: Which side is smarter? My money has been on Apple. The European Commission is proud, stubborn, arrogant, controlling, and convinced it has the best interests of its citizens in mind.Įver since this collision over the DMA seemed inevitable, starting about two years ago, I’ve been trying to imagine how it would turn out. The DMA prescribes not a win-win-win framework, but a win-win-lose one.Īpple is proud, stubborn, arrogant, controlling, and convinced it has the best interests of its customers in mind. The European Commission’s priorities put developers first, users second, and “gatekeepers” a distant third. ![]() I’ve often said that Apple’s priorities are consistent: Apple’s own needs first, users second, developers third. Whether these options are better for developers seems less clear. (Or for non-iOS users in the EU, for that matter.) And much like the GDPR’s website cookie regulations, I think if it has any practical effect, it’ll be to make things worse for users. I do not think the DMA is going to change much, if anything at all, for the better for iOS users in the E.U. Anti-big-business regulation and pro-consumer results often do go hand-in-hand, but the DMA exposes the fissures. There are aspects of it that seem written specifically for Spotify, in fact.īut Rovensky’s framing captures the dichotomy. I’d go slightly further and describe the DMA as anti- U.S.-big-business, because as far as I can tell, nothing in the DMA adversely affects or even annoys any European tech companies. The general public, but do actually read the DMA, it’s quite ![]() Those tend to coincide sometimes, which makes it an easy sell for My second-favorite take, from that same thread, was this from Max Rovensky: I love that I can’t tell if you are talking about the EU or Apple in this case. Overly powerful, rent-seeking gatekeepers seem like a problem. The EU is once again solving absolutely no problems and makingĮverything worse in tech. There is a lot to remark upon and numerous remaining questions, but my favorite take was from Sebastiaan de With on Twitter/X, the day before any of this was announced.Īfter quipping “Oh god please no” to a screenshot of the phrase “Spotify also wants to roll out alternate app stores”, de With had this conversation: Apple’s Plans for the DMA in the European Union Friday, 26 January 2024Īpple yesterday announced a broad, wide-ranging, and complex set of new policies establishing their intended compliance with the European Union’s Digital Markets Act, which comes into effect March 7. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |